🏠 Home / By Experiment / Standards & QC / uncertainty 中文 EN
📐 Standards & QC · Method

uncertainty

Measurement uncertainty
🎯 Difficulty ★★★ Advanced Duration About 1–3 days 🎯 Use Quantify uncertainty components from each stage of the analytical result
📖 Principle
Identify and combine uncertainty components per GUM to derive expanded uncertainty
Below are 5 steps. Open each to see how to do it and add products to your shared list.

📋 Workflow

Full workflow, products add-to-cart directly
1

Measurement model

2 h
Define the mathematical model of measurement and all input quantities
💡 Tip List all influencing quantities
⚠️ Caution Correctly distinguish input vs output quantities
🧪 Materials for this step (click to shop by spec/brand)
2

Identify uncertainty sources

3 h
List sources such as standards, weighing, dilution and instrumentation using an Ishikawa diagram
💡 Tip Be comprehensive without omissions
⚠️ Caution Avoid double counting
🧪 Materials for this step (click to shop by spec/brand)
3

Type A evaluation

4 h
Compute standard uncertainty statistically from repeated measurements
💡 Tip Use standard deviation of replicates
⚠️ Caution Adequate sample size
🧪 Materials for this step (click to shop by spec/brand)
4

Type B & combination

4 h
Evaluate Type B components from distributions (standards/instruments) and combine
💡 Tip Assign distributions per certificate/manual
⚠️ Caution Choose the coverage factor correctly
🧪 Materials for this step (click to shop by spec/brand)
5

Expanded uncertainty & report

3 h
Multiply by coverage factor k to obtain expanded uncertainty and append to result
💡 Tip Often k=2 (95%)
⚠️ Caution Report the coverage factor
🧪 Materials for this step (click to shop by spec/brand)

⚠️ 5 Common Beginner Mistakes

  • Missing uncertainty sources
  • Confusing Type A and Type B evaluations
  • Wrong coverage factor
  • Double counting or missing components
  • Report omits uncertainty

❓ FAQ

+Type A vs Type B?
Type A uses statistics; Type B uses distributions/expertise.
+Why k=2?
Covers about 95% confidence; widely adopted.
+Is bigger uncertainty better?
No; it should genuinely reflect measurement reliability.

🧾 My Cart

Items selected on the product page are shared here
Nothing added yet
🛒 Go to Products
Data authenticity: Product categories from JW Supply Chain standard taxonomy; method→step→product connected. Last updated: 2026-08-23 · v3.0